I gave up on it and went to other powder once the new powder was developing more pressure and was slower compared to the previous stuff. I do not keep in mind if I even attempted normal h4831 or not; I'm considering not.
I have utilised H4831 (and H4831SC), and I utilize it. There are not numerous cartridges which i utilize it for as I look generally to gravitate to other powders. However, I can not claim that it doesn't operate. It is just that A few other powders get the job done greater to get a specified cartridge. As an illustration, in the 280, H4831 gave me fantastic velocity and very great teams with Nosler 140 AB. Nonetheless, RL19 was marginally much better in precision, however the velocity was just about identical.
You will be appropriate They're the same the SC is short Lower so it meters superior, I do not Consider you can find just typical 4831 any longer
While using the 154 grain Hornady SP inside the 280, H4831 gave me fantastic teams and excellent velocity, but Rottweil R905 provides a considerably larger velocity and gives marginally far better precision. With Swift 150 grain Sciroccos while in the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave excellent accuracy and velocity, but RL22 was marginally superior. Consequently, in Every single of those scenarios I went with An additional powder, but I would definitely dislike to divest myself with the H4831.
My expertise is that the SC and SSC loaded to the same body weight because the very long Lower reveals a lowered velocity.
Did you ever consider H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Taking pictures 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with standard chamber. Asking yourself what to expect with 215 bergers with H4331sc?
i've utilized the two and utilized the very same prices and have not been h4831sc load data capable of explain to any noticable distinctions with efficiency. the SC Edition meters a little smoother is about all. any opinions??
Like claimed earlier mentioned, similar stuff. All that differs is the scale with the kernels. I did hear somewhere that they're going to only make the SC Sooner or later. I don't know if that may be genuine or not but would sound right to me. I use SC because that is what I located in the 8 lb jug and it really works.
The primary reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to make the most of the temperature insensitivity of a Hodgdon Intense powder.
The 55grs is all that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I h4831sc think that they've got slowed down the swift to show that their rifles are improved. It bug the hell from me. I understand improved. This is exactly why I don't ever toss out my older manuals. I do order new guide all the time to stay up h4831sc on new chambers and there loading. I exploit this 39grs in summers @ one hundred+ levels without any challenges.
This really is an more mature thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an previous thread. You should consider creating a new thread.
Certainly, you can use the same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, but the SC Variation may perhaps assist you to get a little bit additional in conditions where you are maxing out case quantity Together with the normal powder prior to achieving strain limitations.
The two have the Similar burn up level, limited Reduce is available in handy When you are at max fill and never at tension/velocity that you'd like you can get additional shortcut inside a circumstance.
The container didn't provide the "Serious" brand on it. A coworker and I then swapped some powder, And that i wound up with Yet another pound of H4831SC, this 1 Using the "Extreme" symbol on it.